I really enjoyed going to Hixson
class this week. I remembered doing MTBI
last year as a freshman, but I feel like I got more out of it this time in the
smaller group setting. When Debra was
first going over the different letters and what they stood for, I thought that
my type was ISFJ. It turns out that I am
an ESFJ. After going through the packet
we got and doing the activities, I soon realized why I was an ESFJ, which is extraversion,
sensing, feeling, and judging. I was
very strong (a 30) in the judging category, which is very much like me.
I really liked when we split up
into groups by our preferences between our types and talked about different situations. I learned that I most often like to be
introduced, especially in personal social situations. At work, I prefer to introduce myself. Also, as I know, I really like to ask
questions before making a decision. I like
to do more research and find facts to support my decisions and answers. In this group setting, I learned that a lot
of others in my group, that were concrete thinkers, also liked to do the same
before making decisions. I learned in
class that this is very much okay, and that it is a very normal thinking
process for concrete thinkers.
In the packet we got, there was
one page in particular that I found very interesting, the page that describes
how different personality types work together.
I like feeling best, then sensing, intuition, and thinking last. The packet gave me some suggestions in order
to use my less-favored processes to work with others better. It suggested that I take more breaks while
working with processes I don’t like as well.
And also to find time doing things using the processes that I do like to
build upon them.
Overall, I learned a lot about how
different people think and react with each other that are different MTBI
types. I really enjoyed learning about
this, and I can’t wait to continue to research my type.